Gsplit-dwarf icecc
![gsplit-dwarf icecc gsplit-dwarf icecc](https://blogs.igalia.com/siglesias/assets/icemon.png)
#Gsplit dwarf icecc software#
Software Collections ( SCL ) Repository The good news is, that people realised there was a need for a bridge between the two worlds, so now there are two ways to bring new packages to CentOS: The CentOS world is all about software with 8-10 year support, a real server os, much more stable and thus uses much OLDER software versions, which is why CentOS 7.3 still uses PHP 5.4\. That is my personal opinion of course…ĭescription Honestly, it is a complicated issue. Plus, if I ever need paid work, I can always switch to RHEL. Ultimately, I choose CentOS for its stability, support and backing from RedHat (indirectly via RHEL). While SCL allows you to run both old and new packages at the same time, for example, running PHP 5.4 along side PHP 7 (which is useless for me). I prefer the IUS packages, which replace the existing ones, like running PHP 7. Software Collections ( SCL ) Repository.The CentOS world is all about software with 8-10 year support, a real server os, much more stable and thus uses much OLDER software versions, which is why CentOS 7.3 still uses PHP 5.4. Personally, I don't like their file-system structure, which is not typical *nix-like, it seems like everything has been moved around randomly. Of course it has the tendency to require compiling things, something RPM-based distros have scrapped for decades. Ubuntu, it has a very different policy about versions and updates, so it has more cutting edge versions of popular packages, plus all the little kids find it familiar when coming from an Ubuntu desktop system. CentOS is a real server os, while ubuntu is a desktop os made into a Frankenstein to fit the server market.